my_window_seat: (Default)
[personal profile] my_window_seat
From my e-mail. And I'm sorry to say, I don't think even a mass influx of angry e-mail would make any kind of difference - why the fuck would Bush start listening to anyone opposes him now, as opposed to before he convinced himself of his supposed 'mandate?'

This is an evil fucking world we live in, folks.
========================================================

Subject: The Bush Agenda for women

OK. Its time once again to take a stand. The Pres is at it again.

And so it begins...

Hager FDA appointment: President Bush has announced his plan to select Dr.W. David Hager to head up the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA)Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee. This committee has not met for more than two years, during which time its charter lapsed. As a result, the Bush Administration is tasked with filling all eleven positions with new members. This position does not require Congressional approval.

The FDA's Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee makes crucialdecisions on matters relating to drugs used in the practice of obstetrics, gynecology and related specialties, including hormone therapy, contraception, treatment for infertility, and medical alternatives to surgical procedures for sterilization and pregnancy termination. Dr. Hager is the author of "As Jesus Cared for Women: Restoring Women Then and Now." The book blends biblical accounts of Christ healing women with case studies from Hager's practice. His views of reproductive health care are far outside the mainstream for reproductive technology. Dr. Hager is a practicing OB/GYN who describes himself as "pro-life" and refuses to prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women.

In the book Dr. Hager wrote with his wife, entitled "Stress and the Woman's Body," he suggests that women who suffer from premenstrual syndrome should seek help from reading the bible and praying.

As an editor and contributing author of "The Reproduction Revolution: AChristian Appraisal of Sexuality Reproductive Technologies and the Family," Dr. Hager appears to have endorsed the medically inaccurate assertion that the common birth control pill is an abortifacient.

We are concerned that Dr. Hager's strong religious beliefs may color his assessment of technologies that are necessary to protect women's lives or to preserve and promote women's health. Dr. Hager's track record of using religious beliefs to guide his medical decision-making makes him a dangerous and inappropriate candidate to serve as chair of this committee. Critical drug public policy and research must not be held hostage by anti-abortion politics. Members of this important panel should be appointed on the basis of science and medicine, rather than politics and religion. American women deserve no less.

There is something you can do. Below is a letter to be sent to the White House, opposing the placement of Hager. Please copy all the text of this email and paste it into a fresh email; then sign your name below and SEND THIS TO EVERY PERSON YOU KNOW WHO IS CONCERNED ABOUT WOMEN'S RIGHTS.

Every 10th person please forward e-mail to president@whitehouse.gov

I oppose the appointment of Dr. W. David Hager to the FDA Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee. Mixing religion and medicine is unacceptable in a policy-making position. Using the FDA to promote a political agenda is inappropriate and seriously threatens women's health. Members of this important panel should be appointed on the basis of science and medicine, rather than politics and religion.

American women deserve no less.

1. Chuck Higgins, Santa Fe, NM

================================================================

I applaud you, Chuck. You have more faith than I do.

The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood

Date: 2004-11-11 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hillbillie.livejournal.com
Oh man I've been trying to get EVERYBODY to read/re-read that; when it first came out it was only good reading, but now that I-hope-not-prophetic book is absolutely chilling.

Re: The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood

Date: 2004-11-11 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] my-window-seat.livejournal.com
And you know, red used to be my favorite color...

Nah. Still is.

But damn....

Date: 2004-11-11 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnnybrainwash.livejournal.com
Is this new, or is it an old story that got recycled by someone who didn't look at the date?

See this story (http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,361521,00.html) from 2002.

Date: 2004-11-11 02:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] my-window-seat.livejournal.com
Yes, it does appear to be something like that - however, see latest entry. He didn't make Chair, but he's definately on the committee, and firmly entrenched for another term.

And with the word 'madate' flying around so free and fast...

Fuck it.

Whatever.

Profile

my_window_seat: (Default)
my_window_seat

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 29
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 06:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios